Eyes On Freedom
Politicians, Arrogance, Intelligence and the Media
What’s Mental Health Good for Anyway?
Ernie Hooker
On a daily basis the news media describe certain politicians as narcissists and/or arrogant. In quite a few cases there is a consensus of agreement by the media, the public, and sometimes psychiatrists. I don’t doubt that they are often right.
What detracts from their analysis is how frequently they equate these descriptions with being synonymous with extremely high self-confidence. How can our journalists be that ignorant of a fairly obvious human fault?
Also, there are significant dangers in having politicians making major decisions for the nation when they have a serious personality disorder. Does it really take a psychiatrist to point out the obvious dangers?When the condition is quite advanced (which is usually the case when the media notice) an average person can easily identify the pathology and see the dangers. Is the press pretending they don’t see it or are they actually that ignorant?
Counselor Sandy Hotchkiss, LCSW, is a teacher in a Master’s Program at the University of Southern California and she has a private practice for individual, couples, and family therapy. Hotchkiss wrote a book, Why is it Always About You? In her book, she identified what she called the seven deadly sins of narcissism, seven of which is shared below.
Brief Information on Narcissism:
1. Shamelessness – Shame is the feeling that lurks beneath all unhealthy narcissism and the inability to process shame in healthy ways.
2. Magical Thinking – Narcissists see themselves as perfect using distortion and illusion known as magical thinking. They also use projection to dump shame onto others.
3. Arrogance – A narcissist who is feeling deflated may re-inflate by diminishing, debasing, or degrading somebody else.
4. Envy – A narcissist may secure a sense of superiority in the face of another person’s ability by using contempt to minimize the other person.
5. Entitlement – Narcissists hold unreasonable expectations of particularly favorable treatment and automatic compliance because they consider themselves uniquely special. Any failure to comply will be considered an attack on their superiority and the perpetrator is considered to be an “awkward” or “difficult” person. Defiance of their will is a narcissistic injury that can trigger narcissistic rage.
6. Exploitation – can take many forms but always involves the using of others without regards for their feelings or interests. Often the other is in a subservient position where resistance would be difficult or even impossible. Sometimes the subservience is not so much real as assumed.
7. Bad Boundaries – narcissists do not recognize that they have boundaries and that others are separate and are not extensions of themselves. Others either exist to meet their needs or may as well not exist at all. Those who provide narcissistic supply to the narcissist will be treated as if they are part of the narcissist and be expected to live up to those expectations. In the mind of a narcissist, there is no boundary between self and other.
8. Attribution – Another matter is attributing intelligence or lack thereof to politicians and well known personalities without any factual support. On a daily basis we are bombarded with the news media claiming certain people are highly intelligent and others lacking intelligence. If someone is really that bright why do we need to be told that several times a day?
The same is true if they lack intelligence; let us know and back it up with some factual information, then shut up. Most of the time the supporting information is anecdotes that tell us nothing about the persons actual intelligence. We have all encountered the parent who has grave doubts about a child’s intellectual abilities and continually bores others with their reassurance that he or she is very bright. Is there a parallel here?
The humorous part is that long after the fact if we get information that tells us something about that persons intellectual abilities and we find out it is frequently opposite from what the news media considered “common knowledge.”
Don’t journalists ever take any basic psychology classes or at least use plain common sense?
Dermond WilliamsMay 3, 2013 at 5:52 pm
They have their own pat on the back fest, don’t they. They always say most people feel this way, but never have my friends or I ever felt the way they say. Heres another thing, they always tell us it is for our safety. Good grief, give it a break, we know that boils down to let me get my hands deeper into your pockets. Bet they sit back and laugh at what dumb*)(* we are. But, it seems like enough people are onto them and we will have the last laugh over the crooks in the White house and the TV and radio stations that support them with the liars behind the mics. Thanks Erne, enjoyed your article very much. It is refreshing to see other rational people get it, too.
Dennis BradleyApril 29, 2013 at 7:21 am
Man, you are profound. Hat’s off to you. Well said.
Ernie, have signed up for the RSS feed so I won’t miss any more of your articles. Looking forward to being a regular fan of yours.
PaysonApril 26, 2013 at 5:13 am
Read it, liked it, thanks for it…
Dree GoldMarch 31, 2013 at 8:29 am
I used to cling on to listening to the newscast lecture about how the government should do something about this or that… now, I think most of it is garbage and don’t believe my time is spent well in watching the propoganda machines. They are sickeing. Ernie your insight is ey-opening and you have helped me to put coherent words to the bad behaviors of those with the mouthpieces. Thanks much. Your friend Dree from Czech Republic.